Advertising
From Pink Slips to Silent Sidelining: Inside adland’s layoff and anxiety crisis

A federal judge has delivered a significant victory to Meta Platforms Inc., ruling that the company did not violate US antitrust laws through its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp.
US District Judge James Boasberg, in an 89-page decision, rejected the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) attempt to force Meta to divest the popular applications. The judge found that the FTC failed to prove that Meta holds a monopoly in the social networking market, citing robust competition from rivals such as TikTok, YouTube, and X (formerly Twitter).
The ruling defeats the FTC's 2020 lawsuit, which accused Meta of a "buy or bury" strategy to stifle emerging competitors following the $1 billion Instagram acquisition in 2012 and the $19 billion WhatsApp acquisition in 2014.
Judge Boasberg sided with Meta's argument that the acquisitions provided necessary resources to the nascent apps and that the social media landscape has dramatically shifted toward entertainment and video content. This decision marks a setback for broader US government efforts to unwind past tech mergers, though antitrust cases against other tech giants, including Google, Amazon, and Apple, continue with mixed results.
From purpose-driven work and narrative-rich brand films to AI-enabled ideas and creator-led collaborations, the awards reflect the full spectrum of modern creativity.
Read MoreLooking ahead to the close of 2025 and into 2026, Sorrell sees technology platforms as the clear winners. He described them as “nation states in their own right”, with market capitalisations that exceed the GDPs of many countries.