Advertising
From Pink Slips to Silent Sidelining: Inside adland’s layoff and anxiety crisis
CCI Raids: AAAI's advisory to agencies could backfire, say experts
Empowered under section 36 of the Competition Act, 2002, which grants the Commission extensive regulatory powers. These include summoning individuals, enforcing document production, examining witnesses, and requisitioning records from various offices.
Referring to a previously undisclosed document, Reuters reported today that the Competition Commission of India (CCI) alleges that global advertising conglomerates, including WPP-owned GroupM, Interpublic, Publicis, and Dentsu, participated in coordinated practices that violate Indian competition laws
A recent advisory issued by the Advertising Agencies Association of India (AAAI) to media agencies has raised concerns regarding potential repercussions, bringing the matter under the Competition Commission of India's (CCI) lens. This move has the potential to escalate the ongoing investigation into alleged media cartelization, possibly exposing media agencies and industry bodies to further scrutiny.
The decision to issue an advisory comes in the wake of CCI raids on several major media agencies, including Dentsu, Omnicom, Havas, Madison, IPG, GroupM, and Publicis. The raids also extended to industry bodies such as the AAAI, the Indian Society of Advertisers (ISA), and the Indian Broadcasting and Digital Foundation (IBDF). These investigations highlight the intensifying scrutiny on alleged anti-competitive practices within the media sector.
According to sources, the AAAI’s advisory, issued on March 26, directed media agencies to refrain from any direct or indirect exchange of price-sensitive information. It also emphasized that agencies must establish their pricing strategies independently, without sharing such details with competitors.
Competition lawyer Aniket Ghosh noted that the advisory could potentially backfire, leading to adverse action by the CCI. He pointed out that the very act of issuing a directive suggests that media agencies were previously coordinating their actions. This, in turn, could strengthen the CCI’s case against them.
Empowered under section 36 of the Competition Act, 2002, which grants the Commission extensive regulatory powers. These include summoning individuals, enforcing document production, examining witnesses, and requisitioning records from various offices.
A senior lawyer said, "The CCI can demand the copy of advisory for further scrutiny and it can also probe the matter further for potential irregularities in the advertising sector and determine whether anti-competitive practices have influenced media transactions."
As the CCI intensifies its probe, the media industry faces an uncertain future, with potential ramifications for agencies involved. The outcome of this investigation will likely set a precedent for how media agencies operate in India.
SPOTLIGHT
From purpose-driven work and narrative-rich brand films to AI-enabled ideas and creator-led collaborations, the awards reflect the full spectrum of modern creativity.
Read More“Confusion creates opportunity for agile players,” Sir Martin Sorrell on industry consolidation
Looking ahead to the close of 2025 and into 2026, Sorrell sees technology platforms as the clear winners. He described them as “nation states in their own right”, with market capitalisations that exceed the GDPs of many countries.