How it Works
Tech layoffs 2025: The biggest job cuts in Silicon Valley and beyond
U.S. Court blocks Trump's sweeping tariffs, says he overreached his authority
Sweeping ruling halts President Trump's broad tariffs; court cites congressional authority over trade. Businesses and financial markets welcome the decision, but administration vows to appeal.
U.S. President Donald Trump
The U.S. Court of International Trade blocked his sweeping tariffs on imports in a ruling on Wednesday, declaring that the president had overstepped his constitutional authority, reported Reuters.
A three-judge panel unanimously concluded that Trump's broad-based tariffs, implemented since January under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), were unlawful. The Court emphasized that the U.S. Constitution grants Congress sole authority over international commerce, a power not superseded by the president's emergency powers.
The ruling immediately invalidated all across-the-board tariff orders imposed by Trump under the IEEPA, though industry-specific tariffs on automobiles, steel, and aluminum - enacted under separate statutes remain unaffected, the report added.
The Trump administration swiftly challenged the ruling by filing a notice of appeal, arguing that trade deficits constitute a genuine national emergency.
“It is not for unelected judges to decide how to properly address a national emergency,” White House spokesperson Kush Desai said in a statement, and underscored the administration’s belief that trade imbalances have harmed American communities and weakened national defense.
Markets reacted positively to the court's decision, with the U.S. dollar gaining against major currencies including the euro, yen, and Swiss franc. Wall Street futures and Asian stock markets also rose following news of the ruling.
The ruling arose from two lawsuits - one filed by five small businesses represented by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center, and another by a coalition of 12 states. The businesses claimed that the tariffs severely disrupted their operations, while Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, representing the states, labelled Trump's tariff actions as "unlawful, reckless, and economically devastating."
Also Read: 'India doing very well, increase manufacturing in America': Donald Trump tells Apple CEO Tim Cook
The ruling, if upheld on appeal, could dramatically disrupt Trump's broader trade strategy. Without the leverage of substantial tariffs, the administration may be forced to adopt slower negotiations or find alternative means to pressure major trading partners, including China and the European Union.
The Trump administration has 10 days to issue new orders reflecting the permanent injunction. The administration's appeal will be heard by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, with potential review by the Supreme Court, the report added.
SPOTLIGHT
The leaders highlighted how AI is emerging as a critical enabler in this shift from marketing’s traditional focus on new customers to a more sustainable model of driving growth from existing accounts.
Read MoreExplained: What the Online Gaming Bill means for the industry, users and platforms
The Online Gaming Bill 2025 imposes severe penalties, allows warrantless search and seizure, and empowers a central authority to regulate the digital gaming ecosystem. It is expected to disrupt platforms, payment systems, and advertising in the sector. Here's all you need to know about the bill.