Leading with purpose creates wins for consumers, community and country: Hina Nagarajan of Diageo India

'Largest employer in the world is inefficiency': CRED's Kunal Shah at Storyboard18 Global Pioneers Summit

Unheard tales of Maggi’s redemption: How poetry and nostalgia revived an iconic brand

Content creator Raj Shamani’s journey: Prioritizing substance over virality

MIB’s Ashwini Vaishnaw at Storyboard18 DNPA Conclave: Govt working for fair compensation for media houses

Nobody’s Perfect Retro Porsche Ad

In Conversation With Raja Rajamannar, Mastercard

Shahid Kapoor And Varun Ganjoo Speaks On PokerBaazi's Campaign

In conversation with IHCL’s Puneet Chhatwal & GroupM’s Kate Scott-Dawkins

Why are brands including e-sports in their sports marketing itinerary?

Storyboard18 x The English Nut: How to pronounce these 10 brand names

Experts' Take On Reinvention Of Ad Campaigns Through Technology

Experts Speak On Key Emerging Trends In Cannes Lions Entries

Leaders of the future have to be outstanding human beings: Nestle MD

In conversation with VMLY&R’s Hari Ramanathan

As India's media and entertainment sector hurtles toward a digital-first future, the conversation around accessibility is no longer confined to policy circles, it is becoming a cultural imperative. On May 2, WAVES 2025 - the World Audio Visual & Entertainment Summit will spotlight this urgent transformation through a landmark panel on accessibility standards in media and entertainment, organised by Network18 Group. 

The session, divided into two parts, will explore both technological innovation and the socio-political forces reshaping how millions of Indians access content.

The Ministry of Information & Broadcasting (MIB) has laid clear guidelines for accessibility across broadcast and cinema, and is currently working on similar standards for digital media, inspired by the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). Officials emphasize that the nation's approach is not simply about compliance, but about creating a truly inclusive digital ecosystem, one where every story can be heard, seen, and felt by all.

“Having an impairment shouldn't mean being disabled by inaccessible media and entertainment,” said Christopher Patnoe, Google's Head of Accessibility and Disability Inclusion for EMEA, who will join the panel. “An impairment isn't necessarily disabling until you encounter a video without captions when you're deaf, or a website without alternative text when you're blind.”

At the heart of this transformation is technology. Adaptive tools, AI-powered captioning, screen reader compatibility, and voice-guided navigation are now integral to how content is created and consumed. Yet, as panelist Rachel Lowenstein, co-founder and chief creative officer of The Neu Project, notes, accessibility must be seen not as charity, but as strategy.

“Disabled people creatively solve problems in a world not designed for us every day. That’s the kind of innovative thinking media and tech should be building around, for the good of their businesses and for the good of society.”

The panel will not only showcase technological strides but also dig deeper into the cultural and societal underpinnings of accessibility. Speakers will address how inclusive media policies can serve as catalysts for democratic participation, social cohesion, and a vibrant creative economy.

“Stories shape our culture, fuel empathy, and connect us across differences," said Dipti Prasad, founder of XL Cinema and Nobaflix, the world’s first OTT platform for people with disabilities. "By bringing accessibility, through audio description, captions, and sign language, to every screen, we enrich the creative ecosystem itself.”

India’s ambitious push for media accessibility reflects a broader global trend, but with uniquely local stakes. Over a billion Indians consume an average of three hours of media daily, according to Prof. Brij Kothari, social entrepreneur and academic at IIT-Delhi.
“The most stunning aspect is that the tools that create universal access also have the proven power to scale improved reading literacy and language ability for all 1.4 billion Indians,” Kothari said.

The panel will also grapple with the tension between viewing accessibility as a moral obligation versus a business opportunity. Ashay Sahasrabuddhe, founder of Kintel, framed it this way: "With OTTs, accessibility of content is almost achieved. As entertainment becomes more experiential, we must work towards bringing that experience to persons with disabilities. A cohesive and holistic approach may solve the conundrum of whether accessibility is a right or a business."

For disability rights advocate, Rhodes scholar and co-founder of Mission Accessibility, Rahul Bajaj, the answer is clear. "Media accessibility ensures that people with visual and hearing disabilities are also able to watch electronic media on an equal footing with their non-disabled counterparts. It is a right which every stakeholder must do their bit to help make real."

Indeed, many panelists argue that accessibility is as much about dignity and belonging as it is about compliance or profit.
“Accessibility in the media shouldn’t be seen as a technical fix; it’s a creative opportunity to tell fuller, richer stories,” said Priti Salian, journalist and disability inclusion advocate. “When we build access in, we also build trust and belonging.”

Danish Mahajan, founder of Radio Udaan, India's first internet radio station run by persons with visual disabilities, puts it even more simply: “Accessibility isn’t just about inclusion, it’s about representation, empathy, and the right to experience stories that reflect the full spectrum of humanity." He added, "conversations around accessibility open doors, shift perspectives, and create a world where no voice is left unheard.”

At WAVES 2025, this diverse and accomplished panel chaired by Storyboard18's editor Delshad Irani, will send a powerful message: the future of media and entertainment must be one where no voice is left unheard, and every story finds its audience.

Landmark sessions at WAVES 2025: A call for universal access to media and entertainment

In the lush greens of DLF Camellias—one of Gurgaon’s most opulent residential complexes—a new resident was settling into a multi-crore apartment. Complete with a premium golf set worth Rs26 lakh and frequent luxury travels, Anmol Singh Jaggi, the promoter of Gensol Engineering Ltd (GEL), was seemingly living the high life. But as it turns out, the funds fueling this lifestyle weren’t entirely his own.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) on Tuesday dropped a regulatory hammer on Gensol Engineering and its top promoters, Anmol Singh Jaggi and his brother Puneet Singh Jaggi. In a 29-page interim order, SEBI revealed that the duo had been treating the publicly listed company as a private cash vault—routinely diverting funds meant for business growth into personal luxuries, questionable investments, and family accounts.

“Gensol Engineering Limited is being run like a proprietorship,” the SEBI order declared. What was supposed to be a professionally managed entity with public investors and institutional accountability was, in reality, operating like a family-run outfit where checks and balances were optional.

The report outlines how over Rs42.94 crore from a large loan secured by GEL—earmarked for scaling electric vehicle operations—was rerouted through Capbridge Ventures, a firm controlled by Anmol Singh Jaggi. The ultimate destination of this money? A luxury flat in DLF Camellias, one of India’s most high-profile residential addresses.

But the apartment was just the beginning. SEBI’s investigation exposed a trail of financial misuse.

<strong>1)</strong> ₹50 lakh was funneled into Ashneer Grover’s startup, Third Unicorn—a move that raised eyebrows not just for its lack of board approval, but for its odd mix of venture investing with misappropriated debt.

<strong>2)</strong> Over ₹6.2 crore was transferred to Jaggi’s mother, and another ₹2.98 crore to his wife.

<strong>3)</strong> Jaggi allegedly dropped ₹26 lakh on a high-end golf set.

<strong>4)</strong> Personal travel expenses amounting to ₹3 lakh were charged through MakeMyTrip, once again using GEL’s funds.

Gensol had recently announced a stock split—a move often used to drive up market interest and improve liquidity. But SEBI has now ordered the company to put that on hold, signaling that regulatory focus has shifted from the company's market optics to the far more pressing matter of internal integrity.

The agency’s findings carry serious implications for Gensol’s future in the capital markets. The Jaggi brothers have been restrained from participating in the securities markets with immediate effect, and the financial house of cards they allegedly built now faces a complete regulatory teardown.

SEBI's language throughout the order is striking. Ashwani Bhatia, Whole-Time Member at SEBI, noted “prima facie evidence of a blatant violation of rules of corporate governance... where even ring-fenced borrowings from institutional creditors were rerouted at the total discretion of the promoters.”

This wasn’t a one-off lapse—it was systemic. It was, as SEBI sees it, a culture. A company listed on the stock exchange, beholden to shareholders and lenders, was reduced to a piggy bank for the powerful few at the top.


Golf set, luxury flat, personal travel: Anmol Singh Jaggi’s lavish life on Gensol’s dime

Apple Inc. has narrowly avoided what could have been its most significant supply chain disruption since the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, following a late-night decision from the White House that exempts several of its flagship products from sweeping new tariffs on Chinese imports.

On Friday, President Donald J. Trump unveiled a 125 percent tariff targeting goods produced in China, a move intended to remake America’s trade posture. Yet in a surprise development, the administration carved out exceptions for consumer electronics, including iPhones, iPads, Mac computers, Apple Watches and AirTags — a decision that analysts say spares the Cupertino-based company from an immediate and potentially destabilizing cost shock.

The exemption, however, may prove to be temporary. Trump and senior administration officials have signaled that a new category of sector-specific levies - particularly those targeting goods that include semiconductors - remains under consideration. A separate 20 percent duty continues to apply to electronics manufactured in China, creating a patchwork of trade rules that leaves companies like Apple navigating uncertainty.

Behind the scenes, Apple had been preparing for a worst-case scenario, as per reports. The company had drawn up contingency plans to shift a portion of its iPhone production for the U.S. market to India — a move that would have leveraged that country’s lower tariff exposure, reports stated. With Indian facilities ramping up to produce more than 30 million units annually, Apple believed it could fulfill a share of domestic demand outside of China.

Internally, the proposed tariffs had raised alarms within the company’s operations, finance and marketing divisions, particularly as production timelines for the next iPhone, expected to be largely made in China, tightened.

In the absence of the exemption, Apple may have been forced to raise prices or absorb higher costs, a scenario that risked alienating consumers and pressuring margins. Executives had also expressed concern over whether such a pivot could be executed without disrupting the planned launch of the iPhone 17.

Morgan Stanley estimates that 87 percent of iPhones and the majority of iPads and Macs are assembled in China, products that collectively account for roughly three-quarters of the company’s revenue. The company has moved production of some accessories, such as the Apple Watch and AirPods, to Vietnam, and is expanding manufacturing in Malaysia and Thailand. 

China, which generates approximately 17 percent of Apple’s revenue, has previously retaliated against U.S. technology firms amid escalating trade tensions. Beijing’s Ministry of Commerce described the tariff exemption as “a small step by the U.S. toward correcting its wrongful action of unilateral ‘reciprocal tariffs,’” urging Washington to resume negotiations rooted in “mutual respect.”


Apple dodges tariff fallout for now, as Donald Trump grants temporary reprieve

Meta has been hit with a hefty fine by the Turkish government after it resisted demands to restrict content on its platforms, Facebook and Instagram, as per reports by AP.

The Turkish authorities have increasingly cracked down on social media platforms, particularly in the wake of protests triggered by the arrest of Istanbul's opposition mayor, Ekrem Imamoglu.

In a statement, Meta said, "We pushed back on requests from the Turkish government to restrict content that is clearly in the public interest, and have been fined by them as a consequence.

The company, however, did not disclose the exact amount of the fine, only describing it as "substantial." Meta also refrained from providing specifics on which content was targeted for restriction.

Turkey’s government has been tightening its grip on online speech in recent years, with increasing attempts to control digital platforms. 

Following Imamoglu’s arrest on March 19, mass protests erupted, leading to widespread censorship efforts. Social media platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, and X (formerly Twitter), were temporarily blocked, with over 700 X accounts, many belonging to journalists, media outlets, and student groups, being suspended for allegedly inciting unrest.

Meta fined by Turkey for defying content restrictions on Facebook and Instagram

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has declined to initiate insolvency proceedings against Zomato, as per media reports.

This comes after a legal dispute over alleged unpaid dues of Rs 1.64 crore filed by Nona Lifestyle, a B2B apparel manufacturer.

Nona Lifestyle had accused Zomato of failing to pay for rider uniforms and merchandise, which included jerseys designed for the ICC World Cup 2023.

According to Nona Lifestyle, the company had fulfilled its contractual obligations but faced delays in payments, refusals of delivery due to storage concerns, and increasing pressure from Zomato to provide discounts.

However, Zomato denied the allegations, asserting that all payments for the supplied uniforms were made within the agreed timeframe.

The company countered by claiming that Nona Lifestyle missed delivery deadlines, leading to the imposition of contractual penalties, the report added.

Zomato further explained that payments for the delivered jerseys were made after necessary deductions.

The insolvency petition, which was initially dismissed for non-prosecution in November 2024, was revived at the request of Nona Lifestyle. Despite the reviewed petition, the NCLT ruled in favour of Zomato, rejecting the move to initiate insolvency proceedings.

NCLT rejects insolvency plea against Zomato, providing relief amid legal dispute

OpenAI, the company behind the artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT, presented a strong defense against ANI Media Pvt Ltd's copyright infringement suit before the Delhi High Court on Wednesday, reports Bar & Bench. 

Representing OpenAI, Senior Advocate Amit Sibal argued that since the training of the company’s Large Language Model (LLM) and storage of data occurs outside India, Indian copyright law does not extend to it.

The case stems from ANI's claim that OpenAI used its content to train ChatGPT, which allegedly infringed upon its copyrights. 

Sibal countered that no part of the infringement, as claimed by ANI, occurs within Indian territory, noting that the Indian Copyright Act only applies within India. "Any action that is claimed to be infringement must take place in the four corners of this country. If it doesn’t, that particular action can’t be infringement," Sibal argued.

Sibal also highlighted that there is no evidence to suggest that OpenAI stores ANI's data in India, nor does ChatGPT access this data for generating responses. 

He further clarified that the LLM does not store data verbatim from specific sources but rather uses vast, diverse datasets, learning from linguistic structures and grammar in the public domain.

ANI had earlier accused OpenAI of scraping its content from its website and subscriber data to train ChatGPT for commercial gain. 

However, Sibal explained that the use of data in this manner does not violate copyright laws, asserting that the Copyright Act protects only the expression of ideas, not the ideas themselves or the factual content used to train AI models.

The High Court is now considering four key issues, including whether OpenAI's storage and use of ANI's data amounts to infringement, and whether the case qualifies for fair use under Indian copyright law. OpenAI will continue its arguments in the next hearing.

ChatGPT data stored outside India, copyright act does not apply in ANI case: OpenAI to Delhi HC

India's IT sector is facing an alarming crisis as long working hours become the norm, with a significant number of employees routinely exceeding the legal 48-hour workweek.

A survey conducted by Blind, an anonymous community app for professionals, surveyed 1,450 verified IT professionals in India between March 12-19, 2025, and the findings shed light on the extreme pressures many in the sector face.

A staggering 72% of IT professionals report working beyond the legal limit, and 25% are clocking in 70 hours or more each week. 

This gruelling schedule is taking a toll on mental health, with 83% of respondents reporting burnout. In fact, employees at companies with the longest work hours, such as Cisco, Amazon, ServiceNow, Walmart, and VMware, report burnout rates that exceed 90%.

Top tech giants are among the worst offenders. The survey identified companies like Confluent, Intuit, UiPath, Adobe, Uber, InMobi, Salesforce, Walmart, and Microsoft, where a large majority of employees routinely work beyond the 48-hour mark.

In some companies, up to 42% of employees are working over 70 hours per week.

Despite the intense workload, many IT professionals feel there is no reprieve. A significant 68% of respondents stated that they feel obligated to respond to work-related messages outside of office hours. This reflects a persistent "always-on" culture that was amplified during the pandemic but has since become ingrained in the workplace.

The expectation to be constantly available, coupled with the pressure to overwork, is contributing to a vicious cycle of exhaustion.

The survey also revealed a broader concern over the pressure to overwork, with 75% of IT professionals feeling personally or observing co-workers facing expectations to exceed the standard workweek. 

The constant pressure to put in extra hours, regardless of its impact on productivity or well-being, is a major contributor to burnout across the sector.

Adding to the frustration are comments from industry leaders like Infosys co-founder Narayana Murthy and L&T Chairman SN Subrahmanyan, who have publicly endorsed working 70-90 hours a week. 

Such statements have sparked backlash from professionals on Blind, with one verified NVIDIA employee stating, “Never understood their obsession with ‘working hours.’ Such morons," the report added.

Burnout crisis grips India's IT sector: 25% of professionals work 70+ hours weekly: Report

In an innovative move that underscores its reputation as a brand that resonates with the masses, Fevicol launched the 'Kaala Teeka' campaign at the Maha Kumbh 2025. 

The initiative aimed to address the perennial issue of lost children at large gatherings by using a traditional cultural practice complemented by modern technology.

Sandeep Tanwani, CMO of Pidilite, discussed the campaign's impact and execution in a recent conversation with Storyboard18.

"Fevicol is a people's brand," Sandeep stated, "and for such a large human congregation, Fevicol had to do something meaningful.  We wanted to participate in Kumbh in a fashion where we make a difference to a problem." 

The campaign was inspired by the traditional practice of applying a 'kaala tika' or black dot on children to ward off evil. This cultural insight was ingeniously combined with technology to create a QR-coded sticker that served as an identity marker for children in the vast crowds of Maha Kumbh.

<iframe src="https://www.linkedin.com/embed/feed/update/urn:li:ugcPost:7312799633934581760?compact=1" height="399" width="504" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen="" title="Embedded post"></iframe>

The initiative's primary objective was to reunite lost children with their families. "A large human congregation often leads to people getting separated," Sandeep explained. "Given Fevicol's promise of the ultimate bond, we said, how can we really make it meaningful for people while being true to our promise?"

The campaign's execution at such a large-scale event came with its challenges. 

Fevicol partnered with local authorities to ensure the initiative seamlessly integrated with existing efforts to manage the crowds. "Figuring out how to reach out to the officials and partner in a manner which is effective and meaningful for all parties was crucial," Sandeep noted.

The campaign faced significant logistical challenges, as highlighted by Tanwani. Coordinating with the event's administration and educating parents on using the QR code were crucial hurdles. 

Despite the logistical hurdles, the campaign successfully engaged over 5,000 parents, with the number rising even higher as the event progressed. 

Sandeep recounted a heartwarming instance where a child, lost in the bustle of the Mela, was reunited with his parents within 30 minutes thanks to the innovative QR code system. "A minute of separation causes huge anxiety to parents, and here was Fevicol at the forefront of reuniting the family," he reflected.

The creative prowess behind the campaign was the result of a long-standing partnership with Ogilvy, Fevicol's creative partner for over three decades. "The brief was simple: to participate in Kumbh Mela to solve a social cause in a manner uniquely Fevicol," Sandeep shared. 

Piyush Pandey, Chief Advisor at Ogilvy India, reflected, "Fevicol is a people's brand that does things that always touch the people of India with a strong cultural context. The Kumbh Teeka work is a creation of two young people at Ogilvy who came up with this simple device that was meaningful to thousands of people who attended Kumbh."

This initiative not only showcases Fevicol's dedication to social causes but also its ability to innovate by intertwining cultural insights with modern technology. 

As Tanwani noted, "Even if you're able to do this for one family, it makes such a great difference to their lives that the brand would have made a real difference within Maha Kumbh, and it would have lived up to the promise of the ultimate bond."

'Fevicol is a people's brand', says Pidilite's new CMO Sandeep Tanwani

Ranveer Allahbadia, known for his motivational podcast, made a notable return to the spotlight on March 31 with the latest episode of his podcast. 

Following a period of controversy due to offensive remarks made on Samay Raina's India’s Got Latent show, the YouTuber opened up about the most challenging phases of his life and the valuable insights he received from Buddhist Monk Palga Rinpoche.

In their heartfelt conversation, Allahbadia shared how Rinpoche's teachings on combining wisdom with compassion helped him navigate his struggles.

The monk, in turn, praised Allahbadia for his impactful work, which has inspired millions through his platform, encouraging him to continue sharing wisdom and motivation with the world.

The episode was particularly poignant for Ranveer, who revealed that he had met Rinpoche during difficult times in the past, and this meeting came at a time when he was facing yet another personal challenge. 

"Falling is human, bouncing back with wisdom is rare," one fan remarked, capturing the sentiment shared by many who supported Ranveer’s comeback.

On March 30, Allahbadia shared a post on Instagram announcing the return of his podcast, The Ranveer Show (TRS), apologizing for the controversial remarks that sparked significant backlash.

He asked social media users for a "second chance" and expressed his intention to let his work speak for itself moving forward. The YouTuber also clarified that he did not view the past month as a "punishment" but as a valuable "learning experience."

<blockquote class="instagram-media" data-instgrm-captioned data-instgrm-permalink="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DH0RFz7Cde9/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" data-instgrm-version="14" style=" background:#FFF; border:0; border-radius:3px; box-shadow:0 0 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.5),0 1px 10px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.15); margin: 1px; max-width:540px; min-width:326px; padding:0; width:99.375%; width:-webkit-calc(100% - 2px); width:calc(100% - 2px);"><div style="padding:16px;"> <a href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DH0RFz7Cde9/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" style=" background:#FFFFFF; line-height:0; padding:0 0; text-align:center; text-decoration:none; width:100%;" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> <div style=" display: flex; flex-direction: row; align-items: center;"> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 40px; margin-right: 14px; width: 40px;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center;"> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 100px;"></div> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 60px;"></div></div></div><div style="padding: 19% 0;"></div> <div style="display:block; height:50px; margin:0 auto 12px; width:50px;"><svg width="50px" height="50px" viewBox="0 0 60 60" version="1.1" xmlns="https://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="https://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g stroke="none" stroke-width="1" fill="none" fill-rule="evenodd"><g transform="translate(-511.000000, -20.000000)" fill="#000000"><g><path d="M556.869,30.41 C554.814,30.41 553.148,32.076 553.148,34.131 C553.148,36.186 554.814,37.852 556.869,37.852 C558.924,37.852 560.59,36.186 560.59,34.131 C560.59,32.076 558.924,30.41 556.869,30.41 M541,60.657 C535.114,60.657 530.342,55.887 530.342,50 C530.342,44.114 535.114,39.342 541,39.342 C546.887,39.342 551.658,44.114 551.658,50 C551.658,55.887 546.887,60.657 541,60.657 M541,33.886 C532.1,33.886 524.886,41.1 524.886,50 C524.886,58.899 532.1,66.113 541,66.113 C549.9,66.113 557.115,58.899 557.115,50 C557.115,41.1 549.9,33.886 541,33.886 M565.378,62.101 C565.244,65.022 564.756,66.606 564.346,67.663 C563.803,69.06 563.154,70.057 562.106,71.106 C561.058,72.155 560.06,72.803 558.662,73.347 C557.607,73.757 556.021,74.244 553.102,74.378 C549.944,74.521 548.997,74.552 541,74.552 C533.003,74.552 532.056,74.521 528.898,74.378 C525.979,74.244 524.393,73.757 523.338,73.347 C521.94,72.803 520.942,72.155 519.894,71.106 C518.846,70.057 518.197,69.06 517.654,67.663 C517.244,66.606 516.755,65.022 516.623,62.101 C516.479,58.943 516.448,57.996 516.448,50 C516.448,42.003 516.479,41.056 516.623,37.899 C516.755,34.978 517.244,33.391 517.654,32.338 C518.197,30.938 518.846,29.942 519.894,28.894 C520.942,27.846 521.94,27.196 523.338,26.654 C524.393,26.244 525.979,25.756 528.898,25.623 C532.057,25.479 533.004,25.448 541,25.448 C548.997,25.448 549.943,25.479 553.102,25.623 C556.021,25.756 557.607,26.244 558.662,26.654 C560.06,27.196 561.058,27.846 562.106,28.894 C563.154,29.942 563.803,30.938 564.346,32.338 C564.756,33.391 565.244,34.978 565.378,37.899 C565.522,41.056 565.552,42.003 565.552,50 C565.552,57.996 565.522,58.943 565.378,62.101 M570.82,37.631 C570.674,34.438 570.167,32.258 569.425,30.349 C568.659,28.377 567.633,26.702 565.965,25.035 C564.297,23.368 562.623,22.342 560.652,21.575 C558.743,20.834 556.562,20.326 553.369,20.18 C550.169,20.033 549.148,20 541,20 C532.853,20 531.831,20.033 528.631,20.18 C525.438,20.326 523.257,20.834 521.349,21.575 C519.376,22.342 517.703,23.368 516.035,25.035 C514.368,26.702 513.342,28.377 512.574,30.349 C511.834,32.258 511.326,34.438 511.181,37.631 C511.035,40.831 511,41.851 511,50 C511,58.147 511.035,59.17 511.181,62.369 C511.326,65.562 511.834,67.743 512.574,69.651 C513.342,71.625 514.368,73.296 516.035,74.965 C517.703,76.634 519.376,77.658 521.349,78.425 C523.257,79.167 525.438,79.673 528.631,79.82 C531.831,79.965 532.853,80.001 541,80.001 C549.148,80.001 550.169,79.965 553.369,79.82 C556.562,79.673 558.743,79.167 560.652,78.425 C562.623,77.658 564.297,76.634 565.965,74.965 C567.633,73.296 568.659,71.625 569.425,69.651 C570.167,67.743 570.674,65.562 570.82,62.369 C570.966,59.17 571,58.147 571,50 C571,41.851 570.966,40.831 570.82,37.631"></path></g></g></g></svg></div><div style="padding-top: 8px;"> <div style=" color:#3897f0; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:550; line-height:18px;">View this post on Instagram</div></div><div style="padding: 12.5% 0;"></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: row; margin-bottom: 14px; align-items: center;"><div> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(0px) translateY(7px);"></div> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; height: 12.5px; transform: rotate(-45deg) translateX(3px) translateY(1px); width: 12.5px; flex-grow: 0; margin-right: 14px; margin-left: 2px;"></div> <div style="background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; height: 12.5px; width: 12.5px; transform: translateX(9px) translateY(-18px);"></div></div><div style="margin-left: 8px;"> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 50%; flex-grow: 0; height: 20px; width: 20px;"></div> <div style=" width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 2px solid transparent; border-left: 6px solid #f4f4f4; border-bottom: 2px solid transparent; transform: translateX(16px) translateY(-4px) rotate(30deg)"></div></div><div style="margin-left: auto;"> <div style=" width: 0px; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-right: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(16px);"></div> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; flex-grow: 0; height: 12px; width: 16px; transform: translateY(-4px);"></div> <div style=" width: 0; height: 0; border-top: 8px solid #F4F4F4; border-left: 8px solid transparent; transform: translateY(-4px) translateX(8px);"></div></div></div> <div style="display: flex; flex-direction: column; flex-grow: 1; justify-content: center; margin-bottom: 24px;"> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; margin-bottom: 6px; width: 224px;"></div> <div style=" background-color: #F4F4F4; border-radius: 4px; flex-grow: 0; height: 14px; width: 144px;"></div></div></a><p style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; line-height:17px; margin-bottom:0; margin-top:8px; overflow:hidden; padding:8px 0 7px; text-align:center; text-overflow:ellipsis; white-space:nowrap;"><a href="https://www.instagram.com/reel/DH0RFz7Cde9/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading" style=" color:#c9c8cd; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:14px; font-style:normal; font-weight:normal; line-height:17px; text-decoration:none;" target="_blank" rel="noopener">A post shared by Ranveer Allahbadia (@ranveerallahbadia)</a></p></div></blockquote>
<script async src="//www.instagram.com/embed.js"></script>

In the aftermath of his controversial remarks, Allahbadia had issued an apology to the National Commission for Women (NCW), addressing the inappropriate comments made on the show, while multiple FIRs were filed against him and his fellow participants.

Ranveer Allahbadia returns with a new podcast after India's Got Latent row, netizens pour support

Google has agreed to pay $100 million to settle a class action lawsuit that accused the tech giant of misleading advertisers about the geographic locations of ads placed through its Google Ads platform, as per a Reuters report.

The lawsuit, which was initially filed in 2011, claims that Google violated California's Unfair Competition law by charging advertisers for clicks on ads shown outside the geographic regions they selected.

The proposed settlement, filed in a California court on Thursday, is still pending approval by a judge. If approved, the settlement would resolve claims from advertisers who used Google's AdWords program (now called Google Ads) between June 1, 2009, and December 13, 2012.

The plaintiffs also alleged that Google failed to provide the promised "Smart Pricing" discounts, further exacerbating the issue.

In addition to this legal settlement, Google is facing a series of other significant legal challenges.

The company is currently embroiled in a federal antitrust lawsuit that could force it to sell its Chrome browser, as well as another trial stemming from accusations by the Department of Justice that Google has created a monopoly in the ad-tech industry.

The class action settlement comes after "extensive" fact discovery, which involved reviewing over 910,000 pages of documents and analyzing multiple terabytes of click data from Google. the plaintiffs' counsel emphasized the comprehensive nature of the investigation, which ultimately led to the settlement.

Google to pay $100 million to settle 14-year-old ad lawsuit

Quantum Brief

#FreeOurSkylines

Watch.Listen

Latest News

Special Coverage

Advertising 

Agency News

Media

The Visionaries

Brand Marketing

Gaming News

Interviews

Young Guns

About us

Share the Spotlight

Global Pioneers Summit

DNPA

Power of Purpose

LinkedIN Newsletter

About Us

The AI Edge

Brand Makers

Media News

HOW IT WORKS