Agency News
Why advertising agencies can no longer afford single-sector dependence

OnlyFans has overtaken some of the world’s biggest technology companies, including Apple, Nvidia, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, in a key efficiency metric — revenue per employee.
Data compiled by financial analytics firm Barchart reveals the subscription-based platform generates $37.6 million per employee, far ahead of major tech players. For perspective, Nvidia stands at $3.6 million per employee, Apple at $2.4 million, Meta at $2.2 million, Google at $1.9 million, and both OpenAI and Microsoft at $1.1 million each.
This figure measures the revenue each employee helps generate, signaling operational efficiency rather than company size or valuation. Despite its position in this metric, OnlyFans’ total revenue for the 2023 fiscal year was $1.3 billion, a fraction of what major tech firms earn annually.
Platform’s Model Drives Efficiency
OnlyFans employs around 42 people but runs a creator-driven ecosystem of 2.1 million users who monetize their audiences through paid subscriptions, pay-per-view content, and tipping. The platform retains 20% of all earnings, with creators keeping the remaining 80%.
This model — where the company provides infrastructure and payments while users create the content — allows it to operate with minimal overhead. The platform’s success underscores the strength of decentralized, creator-based business models that rely on network effects and user-generated content rather than traditional product development or hardware manufacturing. By focusing purely on facilitation rather than production, OnlyFans achieves efficiency compared to tech giants with vast R&D teams and complex operations.
Regulatory and Market Vulnerabilities
OnlyFans’ financial performance links to its adult content market, which remains its biggest traffic driver despite attempts to broaden into mainstream creator segments. This dependence has drawn scrutiny over content moderation, regulatory compliance, and payment processor restrictions.
Analysts also warn that the platform’s reliance on independent creators leaves it vulnerable to shifts in regulation, evolving user behavior, and policy changes from financial institutions — factors that could quickly impact its profitability.
Despite being the original architects of global brands, advertising holding companies are collapsing in market value because they still sell human hours while the world now rewards scalable, self-learning systems.