WhatsApp vs Indian Govt: What does the Indian Government want from WhatsApp?

The Indian government said that WhatsApp and Facebook cannot claim to protect users' privacy while monetising their data for business purposes. This was told by The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) in an affidavit filed with the Delhi High Court.

By  Storyboard18Apr 29, 2024 4:07 PM
WhatsApp vs Indian Govt: What does the Indian Government want from WhatsApp?
The affidavit said that WhatsApp infringed upon the fundamental rights of Indian users by preventing them access to dispute resolution mechanisms within the country. The Ministry argued that WhatsApp’s actions violate user rights, citing clauses related to Dispute Resolution and Governing Law. (Representative Image: Dima Solomin via Unsplash)

Last week Meta-owned WhatsApp said that if the government asks it to break end-to-end encryption then WhatsApp will exit India. However, that’s not the only thing the government wants WhatsApp to follow.

The Indian government said that WhatsApp and Facebook cannot claim to protect users' privacy while monetising their data for business purposes. This was told by The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) in an affidavit filed with the Delhi High Court. The Ministry filed it in opposition to a petition filed by WhatsApp and Facebook challenging newly amended IT Rules, reported moneycontrol.

The affidavit said that WhatsApp infringed upon the fundamental rights of Indian users by preventing them access to dispute resolution mechanisms within the country. The Ministry argued that WhatsApp’s actions violate user rights, citing clauses related to Dispute Resolution and Governing Law.

The Ministry emphasised the importance of implementing the IT Rules 2021. It said that failure to implement would hamper law enforcement agencies’ in tracking down fake messages that could lead to societal unrest. The government made it clear that all social media platforms need to be accountable to both users and the laws of the countries in which they operate.

The Ministry specified that the new IT Rules align globally accepted norms regarding the responsibilities of intermediaries in the digital sphere. The government argues that even if a platform doesn't create harmful content, it can still be held responsible for failing to remove it if it violates local laws. The rules emphasise a concept of "secondary liability" for social media companies.


Tags
First Published on Apr 29, 2024 4:07 PM

More from Storyboard18

How it Works

The should be just one agency for TV Ratings: IBDF opposes multiple measurement bodies

The should be just one agency for TV Ratings: IBDF opposes multiple measurement bodies

How it Works

Blueprint for Brand Growth by Kantar reveals marketing prioritisation framework

Blueprint for Brand Growth by Kantar reveals marketing prioritisation framework

How it Works

Legal action initiated against A.R. Rahman over alleged intellectual property infringement in 'Le Musk'

Legal action initiated against A.R. Rahman over alleged intellectual property infringement in 'Le Musk'

How it Works

DoT warns against fake calls threatening disconnection of mobile numbers

DoT warns against fake calls threatening disconnection of mobile numbers

How it Works

HUL restrained from comparing 'Ponds' products with 'Nivea': Delhi HC

HUL restrained from comparing 'Ponds' products with 'Nivea': Delhi HC

How it Works

Elections 2024: BJP leads ad approval requests with Delhi Chief Electoral Office

Elections 2024: BJP leads ad approval requests with Delhi Chief Electoral Office

How it Works

Integral Ad Science announces launch of IAS Election Lab ahead of 2024 global elections

Integral Ad Science announces launch of IAS Election Lab ahead of 2024 global elections

How it Works

Supreme Court questions IMA President: What kind of example are you setting for doctors?

Supreme Court questions IMA President: What kind of example are you setting for doctors?