Ghatkopar hoarding case: Bombay HC finds no merit in claims of Ego Media owner, dismisses plea

The Court said that there was no impairment in the mandated procedure, no legal infirmity in remand orders, and no merits in the contention that his arrest was illegal.

By  Storyboard18Aug 9, 2024 4:40 PM
Ghatkopar hoarding case: Bombay HC finds no merit in claims of Ego Media owner, dismisses plea
Bhinde claimed IMD failed to correctly predict the weather of the next day.

The Bombay High Court on Friday dismissed a plea challenging the arrest of Bhavesh Bhinde, the director of Ego Media advertising agency responsible for erecting a hoarding in Ghatkopar that collapsed on May 13 and led to the deaths of 17 people.

A Bench comprising Justices Bharati Dangre and Manjusha Deshpande ruled against Bhinde’s contention that his detention prior to May 17 (the official date of his arrest) was unlawful, stating there was nothing to support his claim of illegal detention.

The Court said that there was no impairment in the mandated procedure, no legal infirmity in remand orders, and no merits in the contention that his arrest was illegal.

Bhinde, the director of Ego Media Pvt. Ltd., had sought interim bail and requested the quashing of the first information report (FIR), which accused him of committing culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

"The IMD bulletin failed to predict the severe dust storms with gusty winds that hit Mumbai on the fateful day. On account of the aforesaid, the said hoarding collapsed and not due to improper, faulty construction of the same as wrongly, falsely alleged in the said FIR," his plea said.

The "unexpected and unprecedented wind speeds of up to 96 kmph" caused the hoarding to collapse, an event for which neither he nor Ego Media could be held accountable, insisted the petition. As per his plea, the hoarding was legally installed after securing all requisite permissions from relevant authorities.

Bhinde was arrested under sections 304 (culpable homicide not amounting to murder), 338 (negligence and hurting), 337 (endangering human life), and 34 (criminal act done by several people with common intention) of the Indian Penal Code.

First Published on Aug 9, 2024 4:40 PM

More from Storyboard18

How it Works

Brands that prioritize social impact grow 37% faster in revenue, reveals study

Brands that prioritize social impact grow 37% faster in revenue, reveals study

How it Works

ChatGPT data stored outside India, copyright act does not apply in ANI case: OpenAI to Delhi HC

ChatGPT data stored outside India, copyright act does not apply in ANI case: OpenAI to Delhi HC

How it Works

Hiring activity surges in IPO-bound firms; Meesho, Zepto, others add 15,500 employees in 12 months

Hiring activity surges in IPO-bound firms; Meesho, Zepto, others add 15,500 employees in 12 months

How it Works

Creative control or creative caution? What’s really driving content choices on Indian OTTs

Creative control or creative caution? What’s really driving content choices on Indian OTTs

How it Works

Ad, Media and PR industry sees 8% rise in hiring in Feb 2025: Naukri

Ad, Media and PR industry sees 8% rise in hiring in Feb 2025: Naukri

How it Works

India’s media ‘Does not need foreign validation,’ says I&B Ministry

India’s media ‘Does not need foreign validation,’ says I&B Ministry

How it Works

CCI raids could accelerate shift from “media muscle” to “strategic agility”, writes indie ad agency Famous Innovations founder

CCI raids could accelerate shift from “media muscle” to “strategic agility”, writes indie ad agency Famous Innovations founder

How it Works

Breaking News Dominates Viewer Engagement: BrandPulse Report

Breaking News Dominates Viewer Engagement: BrandPulse Report