X challenges Delhi court order to block Hindutva Watch account

Hindutva Watch is a United States-based 'project' that claims to document hate crimes against religious minorities in India.

By  Storyboard18Sep 30, 2024 9:28 AM
X challenges Delhi court order to block Hindutva Watch account
There is an ongoing battle between social media platform X (formerly Twitter) and governments over content moderation and freedom of speech, across countries and not just in India. (Image source: Variety)

The microblogging social media platform X (formerly Twitter) has challenged Delhi High Court order to block 'Hindutva Watch' account.

'Hindutva Watch' is a United States-based 'project' that claims to documents hate crimes against religious minorities in India.

Contesting the Indian government’s directive to block the account, the social media company cited insufficient justification.

In January, the Indian government blocked its X account.

X's affidavit to the Delhi court, dated September 24, said that the government failed to specify reasons for the January blocking order issued under Section 69A of the Information Technology Act.

Raqib Hameed Naik, Founder of Hindutva Watch filed a writ petition in Delhi High Court in April and challenged the blocking order. He further requested the findings of the Review Committee, which is mandated to review all blocking orders under the 2009 Blocking Rules.

The development comes at a time when there is an ongoing battle between social media platforms and governments over content moderation and freedom of speech, across countries and not just in India.

X has attacked takedown of accounts requests in Brazil and Australia recently, after authorities demanded the removal of content on the site they deem as illegal or harmful.

In February this year, X's Global Government Affairs account shared that the Indian government has issued executive orders requiring X to act on specific accounts and posts, subject to potential penalties including significant fines and imprisonment.

"In compliance with the orders, we will withhold these accounts and posts in India alone; however, we disagree with these actions and maintain that freedom of expression should extend to these posts,” it said.

In the past, X also appealed against the Karnataka High Court’s 2023 order imposing a Rs 50 lakh fine on the company for not complying with the emergency blocking orders issued during the 2021 farmers’ protest.


Tags
First Published on Sep 30, 2024 9:12 AM

More from Storyboard18

Digital

Mumbai Police issue third summons to Kunal Kamra, ask him to appear on April 5

Mumbai Police issue third summons to Kunal Kamra, ask him to appear on April 5

Digital

CBI must work with startups to combat AI-driven crimes, says Vaishnaw

CBI must work with startups to combat AI-driven crimes, says Vaishnaw

How it Works

SEBI’s ID mandate for intermediary ads welcomed, but industry seeks stronger AI oversight

SEBI’s ID mandate for intermediary ads welcomed, but industry seeks stronger AI oversight

Gaming

Quick Commerce or Quick cash? Zepto’s promotion of illegal betting firm Parimatch

Quick Commerce or Quick cash? Zepto’s promotion of illegal betting firm Parimatch

Brand Marketing

Google to pay $100 million to settle 14-year-old ad lawsuit

Google to pay $100 million to settle 14-year-old ad lawsuit

Digital

OpenAI seeks $40 Billion in new funding to drive AI expansion

OpenAI seeks $40 Billion in new funding to drive AI expansion

Special Coverage

WPP drops DEI language amid U.S. scrutiny, while Ogilvy global CEO champions representation and purpose

WPP drops DEI language amid U.S. scrutiny, while Ogilvy global CEO champions representation and purpose

Special Coverage

Krafton's Srinjoy Das at GPS 2025: Future of gaming marketing is symbiotic, social, and surprise-driven

Krafton's Srinjoy Das at GPS 2025: Future of gaming marketing is symbiotic, social, and surprise-driven