Madras High Court clarifies no ban on doctors and hospitals advertising in media

The court made this observation during a hearing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Mangaiyarkarasi, who argued for the regularization of medical advertisements in newspapers, television and other media platforms.

By  Storyboard18Nov 11, 2024 10:58 AM
Madras High Court clarifies no ban on doctors and hospitals advertising in media
The court's ruling underscores the need for proper regulatory channels to address misleading medical advertisements, rather than imposing a blanket ban on media advertisements by healthcare providers.

The Madras High Court has clarified that there is no ban on doctors and hospitals advertising in the media, dismissing a petition that sought restrictions on such advertisements. The court made this observation during a hearing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Mangaiyarkarasi, who argued for the regularization of medical advertisements in newspapers, television and other media platforms.

The petitioner claimed that advertisements by doctors and hospitals often mislead the public, with exaggerated or false claims about medical treatments. She argued that such ads promote fake doctors, dubious drugs and questionable medical practices and called for a media ban on these misleading advertisements.

A bench of Chief Justice KR Sriram and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamurthy heard the case and raised concerns about regulating such ads. During the hearing, doctors present in the court pointed out that the media cannot be expected to verify the authenticity of every hospital advertisement. They emphasized that the responsibility to take action against violators lies with the Medical Commission, not the media.

The court acknowledged that existing laws already provide mechanisms to address objectionable advertisements. It advised the petitioner to file complaints with the Medical Commission or the police if she encountered instances of fake hospitals or doctors advertising. Ultimately, the judges dismissed the petition, stating that they could not issue a general directive to restrict media publications regarding medical advertisements.

The court's ruling underscores the need for proper regulatory channels to address misleading medical advertisements, rather than imposing a blanket ban on media advertisements by healthcare providers.

First Published on Nov 11, 2024 10:58 AM

More from Storyboard18

How it Works

India-Pak border tensions threaten H1 OOH adex; key inventories in high-alert zones underutilised

India-Pak border tensions threaten H1 OOH adex; key inventories in high-alert zones underutilised

How it Works

Ad agencies enter ‘wait mode’ amid India-Pak tensions; WFH begins, client meets deferred, projects paused

Ad agencies enter ‘wait mode’ amid India-Pak tensions; WFH begins, client meets deferred, projects paused

Advertising

Amul’s topical ad strikes patriotic chord amid India-Pakistan tensions

Amul’s topical ad strikes patriotic chord amid India-Pakistan tensions

Advertising

Swiggy's losses mount to Rs 1081 crore in Q4 FY25 amid soaring ad expenses

Swiggy's losses mount to Rs 1081 crore in Q4 FY25 amid soaring ad expenses

How it Works

India-Pakistan tensions to trigger 5–10% dip in H1 2025 AdEx; brands hit pause on high-visibility media

India-Pakistan tensions to trigger 5–10% dip in H1 2025 AdEx; brands hit pause on high-visibility media

Brand Makers

Global Ads Spotlight: When AI met Animal Welfare in a Pedigree campaign to boost pet adoptions

Global Ads Spotlight: When AI met Animal Welfare in a Pedigree campaign to boost pet adoptions

Brand Marketing

BCCI may pause IPL 2025 amid security concerns; final decision expected today

BCCI may pause IPL 2025 amid security concerns; final decision expected today

Advertising

Titan boosts ad spend by 23% to Rs 330 crore in Q4 FY25

Titan boosts ad spend by 23% to Rs 330 crore in Q4 FY25