Madras High Court clarifies no ban on doctors and hospitals advertising in media

The court made this observation during a hearing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Mangaiyarkarasi, who argued for the regularization of medical advertisements in newspapers, television and other media platforms.

By  Storyboard18Nov 11, 2024 10:58 AM
Madras High Court clarifies no ban on doctors and hospitals advertising in media
The court's ruling underscores the need for proper regulatory channels to address misleading medical advertisements, rather than imposing a blanket ban on media advertisements by healthcare providers.

The Madras High Court has clarified that there is no ban on doctors and hospitals advertising in the media, dismissing a petition that sought restrictions on such advertisements. The court made this observation during a hearing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Mangaiyarkarasi, who argued for the regularization of medical advertisements in newspapers, television and other media platforms.

The petitioner claimed that advertisements by doctors and hospitals often mislead the public, with exaggerated or false claims about medical treatments. She argued that such ads promote fake doctors, dubious drugs and questionable medical practices and called for a media ban on these misleading advertisements.

A bench of Chief Justice KR Sriram and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamurthy heard the case and raised concerns about regulating such ads. During the hearing, doctors present in the court pointed out that the media cannot be expected to verify the authenticity of every hospital advertisement. They emphasized that the responsibility to take action against violators lies with the Medical Commission, not the media.

The court acknowledged that existing laws already provide mechanisms to address objectionable advertisements. It advised the petitioner to file complaints with the Medical Commission or the police if she encountered instances of fake hospitals or doctors advertising. Ultimately, the judges dismissed the petition, stating that they could not issue a general directive to restrict media publications regarding medical advertisements.

The court's ruling underscores the need for proper regulatory channels to address misleading medical advertisements, rather than imposing a blanket ban on media advertisements by healthcare providers.

First Published on Nov 11, 2024 10:58 AM

More from Storyboard18

Brand Makers

Microsoft's Cindy Rose to succeed Mark Read as WPP CEO

Microsoft's Cindy Rose to succeed Mark Read as WPP CEO

How it Works

Chrome killers? How OpenAI and Perplexity AI browsers could rewire Google’s ad empire

Chrome killers? How OpenAI and Perplexity AI browsers could rewire Google’s ad empire

Brand Marketing

Cannes Lions Grand Prix Spotlight: How PENNY turned price into packaging - and won big

Cannes Lions Grand Prix Spotlight: How PENNY turned price into packaging - and won big

Advertising

WPP cuts profit, revenue outlook for 2025 as client spending slows amid tougher economy

WPP cuts profit, revenue outlook for 2025 as client spending slows amid tougher economy

How it Works

IFBA calls ‘No Palm Oil’ labels misleading, warns of nutritional misinformation and economic fallout

IFBA calls ‘No Palm Oil’ labels misleading, warns of nutritional misinformation and economic fallout

Advertising

Tips Music's adex rises 69%; music revenue accounted for Rs 310 crore in FY25

Tips Music's adex rises 69%; music revenue accounted for Rs 310 crore in FY25

Advertising

Despite digital boom, marketing startups struggle to attract investors

Despite digital boom, marketing startups struggle to attract investors

Brand Makers

Exclusive Break: JioStar's Sanjog Gupta to succeed Geoff Allardice as ICC CEO

Exclusive Break: JioStar's Sanjog Gupta to succeed Geoff Allardice as ICC CEO