Patanjali misleading ads case: Baba Ramdev, Acharya Balkrishna issue fresh unconditional apology to SC

Patanjali's Acharya Balkrishna and Baba Ramdev have filed a fresh affidavit issuing an unconditional apology to the Supreme Court after they were hauled up by the apex court for defying its orders.

By  Storyboard18Apr 9, 2024 7:25 PM
Patanjali misleading ads case: Baba Ramdev, Acharya Balkrishna issue fresh unconditional apology to SC
The SC had imposed an ad ban on Baba Ramdev’s Patanjali Ayurved and slammed it for flouting orders against misleading ads.

Patanjali Ayurved's managing director Acharya Balkrishna and yoga guru Baba Ramdev have filed a fresh affidavit in the Supreme Court, extending an "unconditional and unqualified apology" in the misleading ads case. The case will be next heard on April 10.

On April 2, the Supreme Court had pulled up Patanjali's Ramdev and Acharya and came down heavily on them for defying its orders and observed that the medical advertisements issued by the Ramdev-led company are in the "teeth of law".'Be ready for action', the Supreme Court told Ramdev, stating that the court would need to take contempt cases to the logical conclusion.

A bench of Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah also refused to accept the apology tendered by Patanjali last month. "We are not happy with your apology," the top court said, giving the company one last opportunity to file a 'better' response in its contempt proceedings.

During the previous hearing, the SC severely criticised Ramdev and Balkrishna for not heeding its directives and asked them to be physically present before the court on April 2.

After the hearing, Patanjali Ayurved formally expressed regret to the Supreme Court in response to a notice prompting it to justify why contempt of court proceedings should not be initiated for allegedly breaching an assurance provided to the top court on November 21, 2023.

In the affidavit that was filed in response to the notice, Balkrishna regretted that the advertisement in question which was meant to contain only general statements inadvertently included 'offending sentences’. They assured that such ads would not be issued in the future.

The case relates to Patanjali Ayurved's ads. In its ads for medicinal products, Patanjali Ayurved had claimed to cure diseases or ailments. The SC ordered Patanjali to stop such claims and "misleading" ads and had further ordered Patanjali to stop making any statements against allopathy in its ads. The bench had also asked the government to take immediate action against Patanjali Ayurved in the matter.

First Published on Apr 9, 2024 7:19 PM

More from Storyboard18

Advertising

U.S. Court finds Google guilty of monopolizing digital AdTech market

U.S. Court finds Google guilty of monopolizing digital AdTech market

Brand Marketing

L&T Finance unveils TV commercial for business loan with Jasprit Bumrah

L&T Finance unveils TV commercial for business loan with Jasprit Bumrah

Advertising

“We’ll continue with the campaign, with modifications,” says HUL on Lakmé Ad dispute

“We’ll continue with the campaign, with modifications,” says HUL on Lakmé Ad dispute

Advertising

CCPA directs coaching centres to stop misleading ads, unfair trade practices

CCPA directs coaching centres to stop misleading ads, unfair trade practices

Advertising

Google faces £5 billion UK lawsuit over ad tech practices

Google faces £5 billion UK lawsuit over ad tech practices

How it Works

NCLAT allows Google to redact confidential data from play store billing judgment

NCLAT allows Google to redact confidential data from play store billing judgment

Advertising

Global Ads Spotlight: In Lebanon, a dairy brand’s small jars help fill a void left by economic collapse

Global Ads Spotlight: In Lebanon, a dairy brand’s small jars help fill a void left by economic collapse

How it Works

Brand Battles Get Personal: Why Comparative Advertising Is Having a Moment

Brand Battles Get Personal: Why Comparative Advertising Is Having a Moment