SC questions NCLAT's handling of Byju's insolvency case, suggests reconsideration

The apex court expressed concerns over the selective settlement of dues, urging a fresh review of Byju's unresolved Rs 15,000 crore debt.

By  Storyboard18Sep 26, 2024 10:38 AM
SC questions NCLAT's handling of Byju's insolvency case, suggests reconsideration
The NCLAT had previously closed insolvency proceedings after Byju’s board member Riju Raveendran personally settled the dues with the BCCI.

The Supreme Court on September 25 raised significant concerns regarding the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's (NCLAT) decision to halt insolvency proceedings against edtech giant Byju's. The court suggested that the tribunal's one-paragraph reasoning lacked the necessary depth and analysis, hinting that the case might need to be reconsidered.

A bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud questioned the logic behind Byju's decision to settle Rs 158 crore owed to the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) while ignoring a much larger debt of Rs 15,000 crore owed to other creditors, including US-based Glas Trust. "Why did you pick up only BCCI and settle it? What about others?" the CJI asked Byju's legal representatives.

The NCLAT had previously closed insolvency proceedings after Byju's board member Riju Raveendran personally settled the dues with the BCCI. However, Glas Trust, which holds a 99.5% stake in Byju's debt, filed an appeal, arguing that other creditors had been unjustly sidelined.

Representing Glas Trust, Senior Advocate Shyam Divan criticised the NCLAT's decision as lacking proper consideration, particularly noting that the tribunal failed to include Glas Trust in the creditor's committee. "This is unprofessional... We have been dropped entirely," he stated.

Byju's legal team, led by Senior Advocates AM Singhvi and NK Kaul, refuted the allegations, arguing that the settlement with the BCCI did not disadvantage other creditors. They dismissed claims that Byju's founder and key executives were absconding, with Singhvi attributing the dispute to aggressive tactics by large creditors.

The Supreme Court had previously stayed the NCLAT ruling in August, reopening the insolvency proceedings. With a scheduled hearing on September 26, the apex court has strongly hinted that the NCLAT should reconsider its earlier decision.

First Published on Sep 26, 2024 9:15 AM

More from Storyboard18

How it Works

Meta hires two more Apple AI researchers after poaching their boss

Meta hires two more Apple AI researchers after poaching their boss

How it Works

YouTube Premium's muffled pitch: Why a "sound strategy" isn't converting in India

YouTube Premium's muffled pitch: Why a "sound strategy" isn't converting in India

Brand Marketing

Global Ads Spotlight: How a tiny filter made a big splash in Colombia

Global Ads Spotlight: How a tiny filter made a big splash in Colombia

Advertising

Mast or Meh: Snapdeal, Chupa Chups, Plum, and more – Who scored high and who left you sore?

Mast or Meh: Snapdeal, Chupa Chups, Plum, and more – Who scored high and who left you sore?

How it Works

Sports and Athleisure brands under consumer scrutiny amid rising eco expectations: Report

Sports and Athleisure brands under consumer scrutiny amid rising eco expectations: Report

Advertising

Reddit ad revenue to top $1.8bn this year and grow to $2.5bn next year: WARC

Reddit ad revenue to top $1.8bn this year and grow to $2.5bn next year: WARC

Advertising

Lowe Lintas bags the creative mandate of Tuborg

Lowe Lintas bags the creative mandate of Tuborg

Advertising

Publicis Groupe posts 5.9% organic net revenue growth for Q2 FY25; CEO downplays AI threat

Publicis Groupe posts 5.9% organic net revenue growth for Q2 FY25; CEO downplays AI threat