Digital
Why OpenAI is hiring 100 ex-bankers: Inside the ChatGPT-maker's secret project to automate Wall Street's grunt work
The End of an Era at IPG: How Interpublic came to be swallowed by Omnicom
Omnicom’s takeover of Interpublic Group closes the final chapter on one of the oldest holding companies, as years of structural pressures, shifting client economics and regulatory scrutiny push IPG into consolidation — with significant implications for India’s advertising market.
When Omnicom’s purchase of Interpublic Group closed this week, it did more than combine two holding companies. It effectively ended the independent run of one of Madison Avenue’s oldest and most influential firms — a company built in the postwar advertising boom and which for decades helped define how global brands told their stories. The deal, which creates the largest advertising holding company in the world, was the latest and most decisive sign that scale, data and cost discipline now eclipse the old era’s mosaic of independent creative houses.
Interpublic’s arc was long and, at times, triumphant. Founded from a string of agency mergers and expansions in the second half of the 20th century, IPG grew into a constellation of agencies — McCann, FCB, Initiative, and others — that together offered creative, media buying, public relations and data services across dozens of markets. For decades its growth tracked that of the global brands it served: as P.R. and creative campaigns went global, so did IPG’s footprint. Financial profiles and company histories show IPG operating across creative and media segments with tens of thousands of employees worldwide.
Still, the closing of the deal was not sudden. The merger was announced in December 2024 and moved through a year of scrutiny from regulators around the globe. U.S. and U.K. authorities imposed conditions and sought assurances about competition and political advertising; European regulators offered final unconditional clearance in late November, clearing a last regulatory hurdle and allowing the transaction to be finalized. The price cited put the deal in the roughly $13-billion range.
Why did IPG, long a pillar of the agency world, arrive at this fate?
The answer is structural. Over the past decade advertisers have shifted more work in-house, bought data and targeting from technology platforms, and demanded integrated measurement across media and creative. Those trends made agencies’ traditional margins harder to sustain. At the same time, the rise of massive data and trading platforms — and the specter of AI tools that promise to automate parts of creative production — raised questions about whether mid-sized holding companies could compete on scale and investment in technology.
For many in the industry, consolidation became a survival strategy: larger groups can invest in data platforms, centralized media buying and proprietary measurement at a scale smaller rivals increasingly struggle to match.
The immediate consequences are practical and painful. Observers and experts warned, as the deal approached, that consolidation would lead to job cuts and overlapping corporate functions being pared back. In India — one of the globe’s fastest-growing advertising markets and a crucial battleground for multinational agencies — IPG had already begun workforce restructuring ahead of the merger, trimming some corporate roles while aiming to preserve creative capacity.
India’s Competition Commission had cleared the merger earlier in the year, signaling regulators’ belief that the combined firm would not appreciably harm competition in the Indian market. Still, local executives, clients and agency staff face the prospect of reassigned accounts, consolidated back-office teams and redundancies.
The consolidation also recalibrates bargaining power with the largest global advertisers and platforms. A combined Omnicom–IPG will bring hundreds of billions of ad impressions under a single negotiating umbrella for media buys, data partnerships and technology investments. That scale is precisely what many holding-company chiefs argued they needed to fend off inroads by Big Tech and the consultancies that have been picking up creative and marketing services work.
Yet the same scale that offers negotiating leverage also concentrates risk: a single misstep in client relationships or regulatory trouble could have larger ripple effects across the market. Reports noted regulators’ special concerns about the merged entity’s ability to influence the flow of ad revenue to publishers and platforms; in the U.S., authorities required behavioral remedies to limit potential political-advertising boycotts.
For India specifically, the deal’s effects will be layered. Market commentators pointed out that India is a large and growing market for media and creative services, and that global holding companies have long used regional brands and offices to service local clients. IPG’s networks and Omnicom’s agencies overlap in India, suggesting conversations ahead about brand consolidation, client conflicts and which local agency banners survive under a unified structure. Regulators’ approvals in India ease the legal pathway, but they do not remove the commercial and cultural pressures of integration.
What Dies With IPG?
Partly a legal entity and brand — but perhaps more importantly, a model of agency that once seemed durable. The tradeoffs are familiar to business historians: independence allowed agencies to cultivate distinct creative identities and client rosters, but it also limited investment capacity in the digital and data infrastructures now central to modern advertising. In that sense, the Omnicom acquisition is both an end and a reflection — the end of IPG as an independent holding company, and a reflection of an industry that has been reshaped by technology, consolidation and changing client economics.
The story is not yet finished. Executives at both firms have described the combination as a way to build a new, larger platform to serve global marketing needs; industry analysts caution that the real work — integrating leadership, systems, client rosters and cultures — will take years and determine whether the merger truly creates durable advantage.
For employees, clients and the ecosystems that orbit agency networks, the immediate months ahead will reveal how much of the old IPG will be retained in name, in teams and in the distinctive creative voices that helped build modern brand advertising. Until then, the closing of the deal stands as a watershed: one more old guard institution yielded to the economic forces now defining the ad business.
SPOTLIGHT
From Delhi’s sharp-tongued lyricists to Chennai’s bilingual innovators and North-East India’s experimental beatmakers, Rap 91 LIVE’s lineup was a sonic map of the country’s cultural diversity.
Read MoreEnd of the Old Guard? Publicis outperforms, WPP declines, Havas rises, Omnicom readies IPG merger
As WPP reels from revenue declines and vows sweeping restructuring, Publicis and Havas ride strong AI-led client demand. With Omnicom and IPG on the cusp of a historic merger, the global advertising landscape braces for a power realignment built on data, technology, and efficiency.