Delhi HC quashes Rs 2,000 crore tax reassessment notice against Maruti Suzuki

The court ruled that the reassessment notice for AY 2009-10 was time-barred and based solely on a change of opinion, not fresh evidence.

By  Storyboard18Feb 24, 2025 1:18 PM
Delhi HC quashes Rs 2,000 crore tax reassessment notice against Maruti Suzuki
MSIL maintained that all pertinent facts had already been disclosed during the original assessment, and the court found no merit in reopening the case. (Image: StartupTalky)

The Delhi High Court nullified an income tax reassessment notice issued on April 1, 2016 against Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., for the Assessment Year 2009-10, according to media reports.

The notice, brought forward by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, was dismissed as time-barred—having missed the statutory deadline of March 31, 2016.

According to reports, the case centred on four issues identified during MSIL's subsequent AY 2010-11 assessment. The DCIT had contended that MSIL functioned as a Permanent Establishment of Suzuki Moto Corporation, failed to deduct Tax Deducted at Source on payments, misclassified share transactions as business income rather than capital gains, improperly claimed deductions under Section 35(2AB) for research and development, and mischaracterized warranty provisions as contingent liabilities.

MSIL maintained that all pertinent facts had already been disclosed during the original assessment, and the court found no merit in reopening the case.

Emphasizing that the reassessment was merely a "change of opinion" rather than a presentation of new evidence, Justices Yashwant Varma and Ravinder Dudeja criticized the Assessing Officer for not independently revisiting the facts of AY 2009-10 but instead relying on later findings.

Senior Advocate Ajay Vohra, supported by Advocates Vaibhav Kulkarni and Udit Naresh from Vaish Associates, successfully represented MSIL, leading to the quashing of the contentious reassessment notice.

First Published on Feb 24, 2025 1:18 PM

More from Storyboard18

Brand Marketing

Burger Singh gets interim relief in trademark dispute against ex-franchisee

Burger Singh gets interim relief in trademark dispute against ex-franchisee

Brand Marketing

Mast or Meh: Father’s Day feels - Who nailed it - Instamart, VIDA, or Atlys?

Mast or Meh: Father’s Day feels - Who nailed it - Instamart, VIDA, or Atlys?

How it Works

Bombay HC denies TikTok's plea for 'well-known' trademark status 

Bombay HC denies TikTok's plea for 'well-known' trademark status 

Brand Marketing

Pocket FM brings global influencers to get their ears cleaned on the streets of India

Pocket FM brings global influencers to get their ears cleaned on the streets of India

Brand Marketing

Trademark wars heat up: Gopal Snacks cracks down on imitators in multi-city raids

Trademark wars heat up: Gopal Snacks cracks down on imitators in multi-city raids

Brand Marketing

Disney and Universal sue AI image company Midjourney over copyright infringement

Disney and Universal sue AI image company Midjourney over copyright infringement

Brand Marketing

NCLAT refuses to stay CCI penalty against UFO Moviez and Qube Cinema

NCLAT refuses to stay CCI penalty against UFO Moviez and Qube Cinema

Brand Marketing

Global Ads Spotlight: How iFood served up football - and a 23% sales boost

Global Ads Spotlight: How iFood served up football - and a 23% sales boost