Bisk Farm secures injunction against Parle Biscuits in trademark dispute

Parle Products has purported to infringe the registered mark of Bisk Farm 'Top Gold' by way of malafide adoption of 'Top Gold Star'. The Court passed a stay order restraining Parle from selling and marketing their product under a similar brand name until August 27, 2024.

By  Storyboard18Aug 5, 2024 11:51 AM
Bisk Farm secures injunction against Parle Biscuits in trademark dispute
Bisk Farm adopted the mark 'Top Gold' for one of its biscuits in 2005 and secured statutory protection through trademark and copyright registrations. Recently, it was noticed that Parle Products launched a new product in the same category under the name 'Top Gold Star'.

The Calcutta High Court has granted an ex-parte injunction restraining Parle Biscuits from selling and marketing their new biscuit product under the brand name 'Top Gold Star', following Bisk Farm (SAJ Food Products Pvt. Ltd) securing an injunction against Parle Biscuits in a trademark dispute.

Bisk Farm adopted the mark 'Top Gold' for one of its biscuits in 2005 and secured statutory protection through trademark and copyright registrations, becoming the only entity registered and/or applied for the mark before the Trademark Registry.

However, it was recently noticed that Parle launched a new product in the same category under the name 'Top Gold Star'.

On July 19, 2024, Justice Krishna Rao passed a stay order restraining Parle from selling and marketing their product under the 'Top Gold Star' brand name until August 27, 2024.

Vijay Singh, Managing Director, Bisk Farm said, “We have a distinguished history of introducing distinct biscuits, each marked by its own unique identity, all of which have been well-received by consumers. We are determined to protect our intellectual property rights and brand integrity."

The Order read, "This Court finds that the petitioner has made out a prima facie case and balance of convenience and inconvenience is in favour of the petitioner. This Court also finds that if at this stage ad interim order is not passed, the business of the petitioner will suffer irreparable loss and injury as the respondent using the mark of the plaintiff 'Top Gold' and 'top Goldstar' identical to the mark of the petitioner.


Tags
First Published on Aug 5, 2024 11:51 AM

More from Storyboard18

Advertising

Amul’s topical ad strikes patriotic chord amid India-Pakistan tensions

Amul’s topical ad strikes patriotic chord amid India-Pakistan tensions

Advertising

Swiggy's losses mount to Rs 1081 crore in Q4 FY25 amid soaring ad expenses

Swiggy's losses mount to Rs 1081 crore in Q4 FY25 amid soaring ad expenses

How it Works

Ad spend in limbo as IPL 2025 suspension jolts brand plans amid India-Pak tensions

Ad spend in limbo as IPL 2025 suspension jolts brand plans amid India-Pak tensions

How it Works

India-Pakistan tensions to trigger 5–10% dip in H1 2025 AdEx; brands hit pause on high-visibility media

India-Pakistan tensions to trigger 5–10% dip in H1 2025 AdEx; brands hit pause on high-visibility media

Brand Marketing

BCCI may pause IPL 2025 amid security concerns; final decision expected today

BCCI may pause IPL 2025 amid security concerns; final decision expected today

Brand Marketing

Mast & Meh: Titan, BIBA, Parle-G - who nailed the Mother’s Day moment?

Mast & Meh: Titan, BIBA, Parle-G - who nailed the Mother’s Day moment?

Advertising

Titan boosts ad spend by 23% to Rs 330 crore in Q4 FY25

Titan boosts ad spend by 23% to Rs 330 crore in Q4 FY25

How it Works

Half of 2024 CTV impressions lack full app transparency, blinding marketers: Report

Half of 2024 CTV impressions lack full app transparency, blinding marketers: Report