Patanjali Ayurved's misleading ads case: Kerala Court issues a bailable warrant against Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna

This development comes after the Supreme Court warned States and Union Territories of contempt of action for not initiating proceedings against companies and individuals, who were responsible for misleading advertisements.

By  Storyboard18Jan 20, 2025 7:33 PM
Patanjali Ayurved's misleading ads case: Kerala Court issues a bailable warrant against Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna
The misleading ads claimed that Patanjali products could cure high blood pressure and diabetes.

Kerala Court issued a bailable warrant against Divya Pharmacy, an affiliated company of Patanjali Ayurved, its co-founder and yoga guru Baba Ramdev, and its managing director Acharya Balkrishna. This is regarding a case of misleading advertisements published in English and Malayalam newspapers. The next date of hearing is on February 1, 2025.

The complaint was considered based on the report of Drug Inspector under Section 3, 3 (b) and 3 (d) of The Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954. The misleading ads claimed that Patanjali products could cure high blood pressure and diabetes.

The warrant, which was issued on January 16, the case was registered against them in Palakkad court on October 2024. The court had issued earlier summons for Ramdev and Balkrishna to appear before the court on January 16, and they failed to appear.

To note, a similar case is pending at the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court in Kozhikode, where Ramdev and Balkrishna were asked to appear on June 3, 2024, which they failed to. Then, the court issued them a repeat summons order to appear on August 6, 2024, which again they did not adhere to or comply with. A similar case is registered against them in a court in Haridwar too.

In total, there are at least 10 cases registered against them in Kerala, where four are in Kozhikode, three in Palakkad, two in Ernakulam, and one in Thiruvananthapuram and in Uttarakhand (Haridwar).

This development comes after the Supreme Court warned States and Union Territories of contempt of action for not initiating proceedings against companies and individuals, who were responsible for misleading advertisements, further added the report.

First Published on Jan 20, 2025 7:31 PM

More from Storyboard18

How it Works

Sports AdEx up 7% in 2024 to reach Rs 7,989 cr: GroupM

Sports AdEx up 7% in 2024 to reach Rs 7,989 cr: GroupM

Advertising

Decathlon Sports India's ad expenses up 33% to Rs 87.49 crore in FY24

Decathlon Sports India's ad expenses up 33% to Rs 87.49 crore in FY24

Advertising

CCI Raids: AAAI's WhatsApp exit advisory could backfire, say experts

CCI Raids: AAAI's WhatsApp exit advisory could backfire, say experts

Brand Marketing

ChatGPT hits one million users in an hour as Ghibli maker free image generation goes live

ChatGPT hits one million users in an hour as Ghibli maker free image generation goes live

How it Works

CCI crackdown on major media agencies may spur advertisers' shift to 'hybrid in-housing'

CCI crackdown on major media agencies may spur advertisers' shift to 'hybrid in-housing'

Brand Makers

WPP drops Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion language amid political headwinds

WPP drops Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion language amid political headwinds

Brand Makers

WPP's Mark Read stresses on 'more efficient operations and strict capital allocation' amid market pressures

WPP's Mark Read stresses on 'more efficient operations and strict capital allocation' amid market pressures

How it Works

TV ad market down 6%, fewer ads, 12% brand drop cited: Report

TV ad market down 6%, fewer ads, 12% brand drop cited: Report