Patanjali Ayurved's misleading ads case: Kerala Court issues a bailable warrant against Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna

This development comes after the Supreme Court warned States and Union Territories of contempt of action for not initiating proceedings against companies and individuals, who were responsible for misleading advertisements.

By  Storyboard18Jan 20, 2025 7:33 PM
Patanjali Ayurved's misleading ads case: Kerala Court issues a bailable warrant against Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna
The misleading ads claimed that Patanjali products could cure high blood pressure and diabetes.

Kerala Court issued a bailable warrant against Divya Pharmacy, an affiliated company of Patanjali Ayurved, its co-founder and yoga guru Baba Ramdev, and its managing director Acharya Balkrishna. This is regarding a case of misleading advertisements published in English and Malayalam newspapers. The next date of hearing is on February 1, 2025.

The complaint was considered based on the report of Drug Inspector under Section 3, 3 (b) and 3 (d) of The Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954. The misleading ads claimed that Patanjali products could cure high blood pressure and diabetes.

The warrant, which was issued on January 16, the case was registered against them in Palakkad court on October 2024. The court had issued earlier summons for Ramdev and Balkrishna to appear before the court on January 16, and they failed to appear.

To note, a similar case is pending at the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court in Kozhikode, where Ramdev and Balkrishna were asked to appear on June 3, 2024, which they failed to. Then, the court issued them a repeat summons order to appear on August 6, 2024, which again they did not adhere to or comply with. A similar case is registered against them in a court in Haridwar too.

In total, there are at least 10 cases registered against them in Kerala, where four are in Kozhikode, three in Palakkad, two in Ernakulam, and one in Thiruvananthapuram and in Uttarakhand (Haridwar).

This development comes after the Supreme Court warned States and Union Territories of contempt of action for not initiating proceedings against companies and individuals, who were responsible for misleading advertisements, further added the report.

First Published on Jan 20, 2025 7:31 PM

More from Storyboard18

Brand Marketing

The internet can't stop talking about Vishal Mega Mart's security guard hiring. Here's why

The internet can't stop talking about Vishal Mega Mart's security guard hiring. Here's why

Brand Marketing

Aamir Khan lends voice to WhatsApp's global privacy push

Aamir Khan lends voice to WhatsApp's global privacy push

Advertising

HT Media's print ad revenue drops by 3% to Rs 293 crore in Q4FY25

HT Media's print ad revenue drops by 3% to Rs 293 crore in Q4FY25

Brand Marketing

boAt to leverage e-commerce partnerships, digital marketing to boost sales

boAt to leverage e-commerce partnerships, digital marketing to boost sales

Brand Marketing

Global Ads Spotlight: How the Sydney Opera House’s 50th anniversary campaign broke new ground

Global Ads Spotlight: How the Sydney Opera House’s 50th anniversary campaign broke new ground

Advertising

Tourism brands cut down ad spends on TV by 38%, Digital by 10% in 2024

Tourism brands cut down ad spends on TV by 38%, Digital by 10% in 2024

How it Works

Spotify podcasts found promoting illegal drug sales through AI-generated voices

Spotify podcasts found promoting illegal drug sales through AI-generated voices

Advertising

McCann Worldgroup India wins a Silver, Bronze and 5 Merit awards at Oneshow Awards 2025

McCann Worldgroup India wins a Silver, Bronze and 5 Merit awards at Oneshow Awards 2025