Patanjali Ayurved's misleading ads case: Kerala Court issues a bailable warrant against Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna

This development comes after the Supreme Court warned States and Union Territories of contempt of action for not initiating proceedings against companies and individuals, who were responsible for misleading advertisements.

By  Storyboard18Jan 20, 2025 7:33 PM
Patanjali Ayurved's misleading ads case: Kerala Court issues a bailable warrant against Baba Ramdev and Acharya Balkrishna
The misleading ads claimed that Patanjali products could cure high blood pressure and diabetes.

Kerala Court issued a bailable warrant against Divya Pharmacy, an affiliated company of Patanjali Ayurved, its co-founder and yoga guru Baba Ramdev, and its managing director Acharya Balkrishna. This is regarding a case of misleading advertisements published in English and Malayalam newspapers. The next date of hearing is on February 1, 2025.

The complaint was considered based on the report of Drug Inspector under Section 3, 3 (b) and 3 (d) of The Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisements) Act, 1954. The misleading ads claimed that Patanjali products could cure high blood pressure and diabetes.

The warrant, which was issued on January 16, the case was registered against them in Palakkad court on October 2024. The court had issued earlier summons for Ramdev and Balkrishna to appear before the court on January 16, and they failed to appear.

To note, a similar case is pending at the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court in Kozhikode, where Ramdev and Balkrishna were asked to appear on June 3, 2024, which they failed to. Then, the court issued them a repeat summons order to appear on August 6, 2024, which again they did not adhere to or comply with. A similar case is registered against them in a court in Haridwar too.

In total, there are at least 10 cases registered against them in Kerala, where four are in Kozhikode, three in Palakkad, two in Ernakulam, and one in Thiruvananthapuram and in Uttarakhand (Haridwar).

This development comes after the Supreme Court warned States and Union Territories of contempt of action for not initiating proceedings against companies and individuals, who were responsible for misleading advertisements, further added the report.

First Published on Jan 20, 2025 7:31 PM

More from Storyboard18

Advertising

As ad giants merge and markets shift, agencies turn to brand refreshes

As ad giants merge and markets shift, agencies turn to brand refreshes

Advertising

Cannes Lions to impose stricter integrity standards including three-year ban amid AI concerns

Cannes Lions to impose stricter integrity standards including three-year ban amid AI concerns

How it Works

Spoiled milk and rotten promises: Q-comm firms' hygiene lapses threaten FMCG brand ties

Spoiled milk and rotten promises: Q-comm firms' hygiene lapses threaten FMCG brand ties

Advertising

Google expands AI-driven ads in India, betting on generative search to power growth

Google expands AI-driven ads in India, betting on generative search to power growth

Brand Makers

Microsoft's Cindy Rose to succeed Mark Read as WPP CEO

Microsoft's Cindy Rose to succeed Mark Read as WPP CEO

How it Works

Chrome killers? How OpenAI and Perplexity AI browsers could rewire Google’s ad empire

Chrome killers? How OpenAI and Perplexity AI browsers could rewire Google’s ad empire

Brand Marketing

Cannes Lions Grand Prix Spotlight: How PENNY turned price into packaging - and won big

Cannes Lions Grand Prix Spotlight: How PENNY turned price into packaging - and won big

Brand Marketing

YouTube cracks down on repetitive content: Monetisation only for original creators from July 15

YouTube cracks down on repetitive content: Monetisation only for original creators from July 15