adidas vs ADIDAS: Delhi HC awards over Rs 14 lakh in damages for trademark infringement

The court of Justice Sanjeev Narula also fined Adidas Rs 14.22 lakh in damages, which includes Rs 3 lakh in nominal damages and Rs 11.22 lakh in costs incurred by Adidas in pursuing the trademark infringement case over the previous 13 years.

By  Storyboard18Jul 24, 2024 12:00 PM
adidas vs ADIDAS: Delhi HC awards over Rs 14 lakh in damages for trademark infringement
The court ruled in favor of Adidas AG, finding that the defendants had been using an identical mark, which, when paired with the similarity between the goods—textiles and garments—"creates a real likelihood of confusion."

In a trademark infringement complaint brought by German sports and apparel business Adidas AG, the Delhi High Court on July 19 imposed a permanent injunction against a similarly called company operating in diverse commodities, including textiles, as per reports.

The court of Justice Sanjeev Narula also fined Adidas Rs 14.22 lakh in damages, which includes Rs 3 lakh in nominal damages and Rs 11.22 lakh in costs incurred by Adidas in pursuing the trademark infringement case over the previous 13 years.

The defendants, who sold goods labeled as 'ADIDAS', claimed that their use of the trademark was "bona fide and honest," and that their decision to use a mark identical to that of the plaintiff Adidas was "rooted in personal affection."

The defendants went on to say that they chose the name because "Defendant No. 1 (Keshav Tulsiani, partner/director of Adidas Weaving Mills, Adidas Textile Industries, and Adidas Merchandise Private Limited) held deep admiration for his elder sister, addressed as 'ADI' in the Sindhi community." This admiration was so strong that he was referred to as her devotee ('Das' in Sindhi). As a result, the acronym "ADIDAS" was coined, combining 'ADI' (older sister) and 'DAS' (devotee) to symbolize this familial devoion.

The defendants also argued that the plaint must not be entertained on grounds of territorial jurisdiction as they neither reside nor conduct their business in the jurisdiction of Delhi as well as the delay in filing the suit, as well as on the fact that the defendants have been using the mark in all uppercase while the plaintiff uses the mark in all lowercase, as per reports.

Addressing the question of delay - the defendants claimed they had been using the mark since 1987 - the court ruled that the defendants bear the burden of proof and did not produce any evidence to support their claim.

The court ruled in favor of Adidas AG, finding that the defendants had been using an identical mark, which, when paired with the similarity between the goods—textiles and garments—"creates a real likelihood of confusion." Adding that a word like ‘Adidas’, which has no inherent linguistic meaning and is a coined term which is a unique word, “they are thus deemed to have a high degree of distinctiveness and are given a wide ambit of protection under trademark law.

First Published on Jul 24, 2024 12:00 PM

More from Storyboard18

How it Works

Infosys lays off another 240 trainees for failing internal assessments

Infosys lays off another 240 trainees for failing internal assessments

How it Works

To combat mislabelling/adulteration, FSSAI floats consultation paper on dairy analogue regulations

To combat mislabelling/adulteration, FSSAI floats consultation paper on dairy analogue regulations

How it Works

The high price of ratings: Gig workers struggle under arbitrary review systems

The high price of ratings: Gig workers struggle under arbitrary review systems

How it Works

GCC boom positions India at core of global advertising operations

GCC boom positions India at core of global advertising operations

Brand Makers

Ahead of IPO, Flipkart discontinues work-from-home policy, mandates 5-day office attendance

Ahead of IPO, Flipkart discontinues work-from-home policy, mandates 5-day office attendance

How it Works

Discretionary spends dip as rural India tightens purse strings: GroupM-Kantar Rural Barometer 2025

Discretionary spends dip as rural India tightens purse strings: GroupM-Kantar Rural Barometer 2025

How it Works

Wipro adds 10,000 freshers in FY25, remains cautious on wage hikes amid global uncertainity

Wipro adds 10,000 freshers in FY25, remains cautious on wage hikes amid global uncertainity

How it Works

No direct, indirect association with Mahadev Betting App: EaseMyTrip issues statement amid ED raids

No direct, indirect association with Mahadev Betting App: EaseMyTrip issues statement amid ED raids