Beyond cancellation: When controversy becomes a creator's calculated comeback
Across formats—be it interviews, longform podcasts, or tongue-in-cheek ads, today’s influencers are rewriting the rules of reputational recovery. In the creator economy, a fall from grace isn’t the end. Often, it’s just the start of a more clickable second act.
ADVERTISEMENT
When Ranveer Allahbadia appeared alongside Barkha Dutt in a Piers Morgan-hosted video on the India–Pakistan conflict, many hailed it as a comeback moment. His peace-forward message was praised by fans and seen by some as an attempt to reclaim his public image after earlier criticism stemming from controversial comments he made during the 'India's Got Latent' show.
Meanwhile, entrepreneur-podcaster Raj Shamani recently faced heat for hosting businessman Vijay Mallya. The viral episode drew widespread backlash for portraying Mallya as a victim of circumstance, rather than holding him accountable. Critics called out the glorification of power under the guise of access, and the cost of chasing virality at the expense of ethics.
In a satirical ad with sexual wellness brand Bold Care, comedian and creator of polarizing YouTube show India's Got Latent, Samay Raina leaned into his own past controversy with dark humor and self-aware wit. The internet’s response was divided: some found it bold and redemptive, others saw it as tone-deaf. But one thing was clear; the ad was a calculated play in a digital world where virality often trumps caution.
Across formats - be it interviews, longform podcasts, or tongue-in-cheek ads - today’s influencers are rewriting the rules of managing reputational crisis and recovery. In the creator economy, a fall from grace isn’t the end. Often, it’s just the start of a more clickable second act. A third or fourth too perhaps.
“People love a redemption arc,” says marketer Petal Gangurde. “There’s strong public curiosity around ‘what’s next’ for controversial influencers. While audiences might cancel someone temporarily, they’re equally intrigued by a clever comeback.”
That intrigue is now baked into influencer strategy. From silence to satire, the comeback is often designed.
“Influencers aren’t waiting for moments anymore - they’re creating them,” says Azazul Haque, Group Chief Creative Officer at Creativeland Asia. “Controversy feeds engagement. Certain comments and content are expected to engineer backlash and comebacks. It is not accidental. It is choreography.”
And not all brands shy away from controversy.
“It depends on the intensity of the controversy,” explains Viraj Seth, CEO and Co-Founder, Monk Entertainment. “Some brands see it as dilution. Others, especially those chasing attention prioritize reach. Owning the narrative has always mattered. But now, with direct-to-audience platforms, creators can shape their version of the truth in real-time.”
Still, recovery depends heavily on tone, context, and category.
“Categories like health and finance are trust-sensitive,” says Rachit Sharma, Head of Brand Partnerships at Qoruz. “Audiences won’t forgive misinformation easily. But lifestyle or entertainment creators have more narrative flexibility. Their communities often move on quicker - especially if the follow-up is smart.”
Sharma outlines some of the most effective formats for bouncing back:
Self-aware humor or parody
Behind-the-scenes explainers or longform podcasts
Collaborations with credible experts (lawyers, doctors, policy folks)
Direct community engagement - through comments, apology posts, or interviews
“Tone is everything,” he adds. “If it feels authentic and not performative, recovery is not only possible, it’s often fast. Engagement might dip short-term, but if the creator had a loyal base, they rebound. You’ll see comment spikes even when likes drop. That’s public discourse in action.”
In Bold Care’s case, the choice to pair with a polarizing voice made sense.
“It was a smart, well-calculated move,” says Haque. “They’re a bold brand with little to lose, targeting a Gen Z and millennial market that’s already desensitized to scandal.”
But not all brands can afford that kind of alignment. “It really depends on the brand,” says Azazul. “For a brand like Taco Bell that targets Gen Z, I wouldn’t hesitate to work with someone like Samay Raina — the brand needs that edge. But if it were a Tata, I’d advise against it. It doesn’t align with their image and could harm the brand. Then there’s a third kind of advertising mindset that says — regardless of brand fit — you must be part of the conversation and chase visibility. That’s where things get tricky.”
And for many brands, especially younger ones, the cost of that visibility can be long-lasting.
“It’s a slippery slope,” says Gangurde. “You may start off with something that seems like harmless controversy, but end up facing legal or reputational fallout that drags on for years. Especially with new-age brands - many of which aren’t profitable and run on investor capital - the risks are amplified.
Gangurde adds, "Trust takes time to build. While digital perception matters, consumer trust also depends on product value, consistency, and the brand’s overall proposition. But missteps can land both the brand and its custodians in serious trouble. Sometimes, people become unhireable. Brands become untouchable to investors.”
This spectrum from calculated alignment to visibility-chasing, shapes how agencies and marketers navigate comeback collaborations. And in the world of moment-driven content, even missteps can become momentum.
“That Bold Care ad is hilarious but some felt it lacked accountability,” says Sahil Chopra, Founder and CEO, iCubesWire, and Chairman of IIGC. “It doesn’t seem apologetic, and that can be polarizing. Still, if content stays within platform guardrails, creators and brands should be able to play.”
“Comebacks work when they’re authentic,” says Pranav Panpalia, Founder, OpraahFX. “The creator economy thrives on originality and emotional connection. In a world flooded with content, a comeback must be intentional, well-timed, audience-aligned, and rooted in accountability."
However, Panpalia warns that satire works only when real reflection comes first. He adds, "Yes, audiences can be forgiving, but it depends. We’ve seen creators bounce back after intense backlash. But trust can’t be taken for granted. Especially on sensitive topics, audiences are quick to call out missteps. In the end, comebacks aren’t about noise—they’re about rebuilding trust.”
Chopra also predicts moderation will soon catch up. “Think OTT platforms five years ago - raw, unfiltered. Now? More censored. The influencer space will undergo a similar evolution. Platforms like Meta and Google can’t remain silent; they have to share the accountability burden.”
“Brands used to cut ties the moment backlash hit,” adds Panpalia. “Now, some are smarter. They see the upside of honest storytelling. A clever, transparent narrative - like the Samay Raina x Bold Care ad - doesn’t harm trust. It deepens it.”
Ultimately, digital redemption is about timing, tone, and trust. It’s also about knowing that today’s consumers don’t want perfect role models. They want layered ones. Fallible ones. Ones who mess up, own it, and meme their way out of it.
